7 Comments
Dec 9, 2022Liked by Anton Howes

"Caloric" is very similar to what we now call "thermal energy". It acts like thermal energy acts, e.g., goes from hotter to colder, so it's not surprising that Carnot and others came to correct conclusions from incorrect premises. Caloric was matter not energy, but it was "a kind of infinitesimally subtle fluid substance" that acted like thermal energy, so there was little practical difference.

Expand full comment
Dec 9, 2022Liked by Anton Howes

What is the most interesting to me is how little science mattered for the technological advances of the Industrial Revolution. High-pressure steam engines were moving trains, ships, pumps, millstones and industrial machinery before scientists started to figure out thermodynamics, the same way people had been using yeast to ferment, brew and bake for millennia before we figured out it's a living thing.

Expand full comment
Dec 9, 2022Liked by Anton Howes

I really enjoyed reading this, thank you for posting. I am the opposite of scientifically inclined, but it occurred to me that Carnot's premise, that heat flowed like water, begged an obvious question: if water is impelled to motion through gravity, what force would 'impel' heat to flow?

Expand full comment

I would have loved these pieces added throughout my physics undergrad for fun

Expand full comment